|
|
Post by EnglishWanabe on Mar 4, 2006 12:24:47 GMT 9.5
Well i am very appauled at this site www.thefilmexperience.net/misc/aughts_actress5.htmlnominating miranda as only the 46th best actress.....however i cant say i agree with their decisions as kirsten dunst is 2nd i think and NICOLE KIDMAN is 1st yulk obviously they aren't going for quality and Catherine Zeta-Jones is placed 32  . oh btw i thought some fellow meryl fans would like to know theres a new film coming out with meryl streep playing the MOTHER of Lindsay Lohan i mean how dare they put such a highly acclaimed actress like meryl streep and place her with LINDSAY! i know some of you will disagree with me so sorry for that lol |
|
|
|
Post by Incapability on Mar 4, 2006 22:52:59 GMT 9.5
wait a minute - cerberus topped Miranda?? 14 ranks?? HAS THE PLANET GONE MAD?!? Let me at them! Let me at them! who voted for that ranking?
|
|
|
|
Post by Anne Mette on Mar 5, 2006 10:31:02 GMT 9.5
I did not!!! That is almost offensive!!! She actually topped Miranda?!?!?! I cant believe it!
I wil defninatly let you at them, Incap!
I agree totally about the movie Meryl is in! How in the world can she be in the same movie as Linsday? I hate it! Meryl is like THIS talented while Lohan has like.....none talent!
|
|
|
|
Post by Anne Mette on Mar 5, 2006 10:33:19 GMT 9.5
MG!!!! CERBERUS EVEN TOPPED SUSAN SARANDON!!!!!!!! MENTAL!!!!
sorry for my double posting, but that is insane!
|
|
|
|
Post by EnglishWanabe on Mar 5, 2006 11:31:51 GMT 9.5
i know i mean kursten dundst topped meryl streep!
|
|
|
|
Post by Incapability on Mar 5, 2006 19:41:46 GMT 9.5
well, at least Miranda is only two ranks behind this Julia Roberts person whose only quality is her over-broad smile.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anne Mette on Mar 5, 2006 23:50:27 GMT 9.5
Yeah! But what a drag! CERBERUS TOPPED SUSAN SARANDON AND CATHERINE O'HARA!!!! UAAAAAAAH!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by forgottenicetea on Mar 6, 2006 4:41:08 GMT 9.5
hey. isn't it ironical that nicole is #1??
|
|
|
|
Post by Mel on Mar 6, 2006 4:42:35 GMT 9.5
Maggie Smith is only #76!
This person who did this is obviously not very good at recognizing talent over just plain old celebrities.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mel on Mar 6, 2006 4:49:26 GMT 9.5
Ah. It was compiled Sept 2005. Some of those spots would probably be much different now. There are so many people on there who just had terrific roles in amazing movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by EnglishWanabe on Mar 6, 2006 15:18:19 GMT 9.5
yea but NICOLE KIDMAN WAS FIRST!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Anne Mette on Mar 7, 2006 0:37:57 GMT 9.5
I can't believe that she got #1! It is slightly weird that anyone would do that at all!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mel on Mar 7, 2006 7:08:12 GMT 9.5
She's okay, but I don't think she's THE greatest. Most of her movies lately have sucked anyways.
|
|
|
|
Post by EnglishWanabe on Mar 7, 2006 21:45:11 GMT 9.5
the ONLY film she was remotely good in was The Hours and that was basically because she had to looked like a stunned mullet for the duration of the film
|
|
|
|
Post by Anne Mette on Mar 7, 2006 22:51:36 GMT 9.5
I loved Moulin Rouge too. Anyone seen Stepford Wives? That is kinda good actually, but because of the other actors in it.
|
|
. 
